home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: longwood.cs.ucf.edu!not-for-mail
- From: schnitzi@longwood.cs.ucf.edu (Mark Schnitzius)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Statistically Random Number algorithm
- Date: 28 Mar 1996 16:22:16 -0500
- Organization: University of Central Florida
- Message-ID: <4jevu8$jvi@longwood.cs.ucf.edu>
- References: <314D0B67.3C16@psu.edu> <4ikle5$1rf@sparcserver.lrz-muenchen.de> <mjs.827190032@hubcap>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: longwood.cs.ucf.edu
-
- mjs@hubcap.clemson.edu (M. J. Saltzman) writes:
-
- >In a seminar that I saw, Percy Diaconis (the Harvard
- >mathematician/magician known for some results about card shuffling)
- >pointed out that some experiments with using atomic particle decay to
- >produce random bits produced notoriously bad results, based on even
- >simple tests for randomness.
-
-
- Interesting. What were the problems with it? My understanding is
- that particle decay is the only true source of randomness there is.
- Was the problem with calibration or something? If particle decay
- was proven to be non-random it would significantly affect our
- understanding of the universe...
-
-
- _____________________________________________________________
- mark schnitzius - - - - - - - - - - - - - schnitzi@mentos.com
- <a href="http://east.isx.com/~schnitzi/">me</a>
- "I don't know if it's good that they did invent the wheel
- But ever since... I've been rolling on to you" --Frank Black
-